A few minutes back as we were going over a Nokia announcement (Nokia Streamlines Operations in Several Units and Functions) that’s actually about firing another 1,700 employees worldwide, we couldn’t help but wonder at the flexibility of the English language in dealing with what’s a straightforward issue – laying off or kicking out employees.
Here are several euphemisms that corporations use to sugarcoat what essentially amounts to kicking out their employees:
* adjust operations
* streamline operations
* downsize
* rightsize
* affect
* scale down
* reduction in force
* headcount reduction
* align staff to current needs
* realignment of personnel
* workforce reduction
* effectively manage personnel
* resource reduction action
* management is restructuring
* redundancies caused by merger of business units
* leaving for family reasons (applies to folks at the top)
* rationalising staff
* staff redeployment exercise
* failed to pass annual evaluation (used by the Indian IT chors)
Folks, do you know of more terms/expressions that corporations deploy when they are giving employees a big kick on their backsides and shoving them onto the street?
Jan. 26: IBM (nyse: IBM – news – people ) selects 2,800 to participate in its “current resource reduction action.â€
SearchIndia.com Responds:
Added resource reduction action.
Thanks.
Management is restructuring.
SearchIndia.com Responds:
Added to the list.
Thanks.
We are often “merging business units”, though this affects the pay-hogs at the top of the heap more than the ones lower down.
SearchIndia.com Responds:
Yes, redundancies caused by merging business units. Added to above list. Thanks.
One more – leaving for family reasons (applies to folks at the top).
Rationalising staff.
Staff redeployment exercise.
Synergy of business units.
SearchIndia.com Responds:
Added Rationalising staff and Staff redeployment exercise to the above list.
Thanks.